FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [October 2016 Threads]
For what it's worth, I have found a managed switch invaluable for this kind of thing. They are not that expensive.
Regards,
Rob
-------- Original message --------
From: Joe Hinkle joehinkle@users.sf.net
Date: 01/10/2016 23:33 (GMT+00:00)
To: "[freertos:discussion]" <382005@discussion.freertos.p.re.sf.net>
Subject: [freertos:discussion] TCP - Can you explain this behavior?
Jean-Paul:
Thanks for commenting.
I've noticed the same behavior most of the time.
I take it that wireshark may not be processing the packets in the same order they appear on the network.
In order for may computer, running wireshark, to able able to capture packets to/from my embedded FreeRtos project, I have both the embedded project and the computer connected to a 4 port HUB - not a switch.
I'm wondering if the HUB is paying a part in the way wireshark receives the packets.
I have sent a new pcap file.
Joe
TCP - Can you explain this behavior?
Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in https://sourceforge.net/p/freertos/discussion/382005/
To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.