|
|||||||||||||||
FreeRTOS Support ArchiveThe FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
Loading
heap2.c vs lwip's mem.cPosted by pbeamtn on November 6, 2008 I have ported the gcc ARM7 project with lwip to IAR, but I have discovered I have 2 different heaps, which seems inefficient. Lwip seems to have some status functions with their implementation, so I can determine how much of the heap is actually used. My question is this, would FreeRTOS work if I substituted lwip's malloc() and free() instead of those provided by heap2.c? I'm feeling cramped for RAM, and I think this would help. I don't currently dynamically create and kill tasks, etc, so I believe FreeRTOS would just allocate memory at startup. Paul RE: heap2.c vs lwip's mem.cPosted by Richard on November 7, 2008 You can allocate the memory required by FreeRTOS.org any way you want - just provide implementations of pvPortMalloc() and vPortFree() that wrap the lwIP calls if that is your preferred method. The heaps that come with FreeRTOS.org are intended for demo purposes only as each embedded system has different requirements for memory management. Take care about mutual exclusion and fragmentation though. Regards.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||
NXP tweet showing LPC5500 (ARMv8-M Cortex-M33) running FreeRTOS.
Meet Richard Barry and learn about running FreeRTOS on RISC-V at FOSDEM 2019
Version 10.1.1 of the FreeRTOS kernel is available for immediate download. MIT licensed.
View a recording of the "OTA Update Security and Reliability" webinar, presented by TI and AWS.
FreeRTOS and other embedded software careers at AWS.
