FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [November 2008 Threads] STR912 Port ErrorPosted by paolo ferrari on November 11, 2008 Hi all, I'm new and I would use FreeRTOS on STR912FA with IAR compiler. I downloaded the last version (5.1.0) and the compiler gives this error:
Error[Li005]: no definition for "usTaskCheckFreeStackSpace" [referenced from C:\Documents and Settings\paolo\Documenti\str912\RTOS\FreeRTOSV5.1.0\ FreeRTOSV5.1.0\FreeRTOS\Demo\ARM9_STR91X_IAR\ARM - uIP - D\Obj\tasks.o]
In the file task.c I saw that the definition of the prototype "usTaskCheckFreeStackSpace" is different from that of the function
#if ( ( configUSE_TRACE_FACILITY == 1 ) || ( INCLUDE_uxTaskGetStackHighWaterMark == 1 ) ) <------- Different ******
unsigned portSHORT usTaskCheckFreeStackSpace( const unsigned portCHAR * pucStackByte );
#endif
#if ( INCLUDE_uxTaskGetStackHighWaterMark == 1 ) <------- Different ******
unsigned portSHORT usTaskCheckFreeStackSpace( const unsigned portCHAR * pucStackByte ) { register unsigned portSHORT usCount = 0;
while( *pucStackByte == tskSTACK_FILL_BYTE ) { pucStackByte -= portSTACK_GROWTH; usCount++; }
usCount /= sizeof( portSTACK_TYPE );
return usCount; }
#endif
Setting them equal everything works properly, or should I set "INCLUDE_uxTaskGetStackHighWaterMark" to 1? What is the correct thing to do?
Thanks for your answer Paolo Ferrari
RE: STR912 Port ErrorPosted by woops_ on November 11, 2008 There is an inconsistency introduced in 5.10 in the macros that include functions that rely on each other. There is a bug report in the tracker for this issue and it is noted on the known issues list with the fix given. I think the SVN version has a fix as well.
RE: STR912 Port ErrorPosted by paolo ferrari on November 11, 2008 Thanks woops,
I look the tracker
Paolo
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|