FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [May 2017 Threads] Stack measurement is not correct on MC912XE controller.Posted by jaswanthkamadan on May 30, 2017 Hi All,
I am using the MC9S12XE controller with Free RTOS version of 8.0.1. with Code warrior version 5.1, i created a dummy task with initialization of some local variable of integer size, but stack measurement function "uxTaskGetStackHighWaterMark" giving the value as 190. If i run Application specific tasks, for every task it is showing as 190; Is there any way to calculate the stack size?. what is the reason of showing the value for every task?
Regards
Jaswanth
Stack measurement is not correct on MC912XE controller.Posted by rtel on May 30, 2017 Does the MC9S12XEW use segmented memory? If so, that may be the reason
it is not working as expected. I can't recall the reason for that
exactly, but know that was an issue on other segmented memory architectures.
You can of course step through the execution of the code in your
debugger to see why it is coming up with the number it is.
Stack measurement is not correct on MC912XE controller.Posted by jaswanthkamadan on May 31, 2017 What do you meant by segmented memeory? I am using Baked Memory Model with Paged and Non Paged segmentation. Do you meant this segmentation only?
I debugged with debugger, Handle Pointer value is not correct. It is taking Junk value(Garbbage Address). It is checking from there whether 0xA5 Available in that perticular Address.
Can you Please tell me the solution for this.
Thanks In Advance
Regards
Jaswanth
Stack measurement is not correct on MC912XE controller.Posted by jaswanthkamadan on May 31, 2017 What do you meant by segmented memeory? I am using Baked Memory Model with Paged and Non Paged segmentation. Do you meant this segmentation only?
I debugged with debugger, Handle Pointer value is not correct. It is taking Junk value(Garbbage Address). It is checking from there whether 0xA5 Available in that perticular Address.
Can you Please tell me the solution for this.
Thanks In Advance
Regards
Jaswanth
Stack measurement is not correct on MC912XE controller.Posted by jaswanthkamadan on June 6, 2017 Hello All,
I tried with heap_1.c file, The stack measurement fuction "uxTaskGetStackHighWaterMark" is giving correct value no of 0xA5 present in the perticular memory location. is it the correct behaviour?
we are thinking it will give the value after running of the task.
Can you please give me the correct idea which one is correct?
Thanks & Regards
Jaswanth
Stack measurement is not correct on MC912XE controller.Posted by rtel on June 6, 2017 I'm afraid I don't understand your question. The correct behaviour is
as described here: http://www.freertos.org/uxTaskGetStackHighWaterMark.html
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|