|
|||||||||||||||
FreeRTOS Support ArchiveThe FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
Loading
FreeRTOS on Microblaze - fast_interrupt vs interrupt_handlerPosted by npatel on January 3, 2017 I am working with microblaze and I can see the port is using the address 0x10 and one function to handle interrupts. This allows proper saving on stack etc. for the operating system. If I wanted to use the fastinterrupt attribute, which simply jumps to the interrupt fuction instead of having to jump to 0x10 address, what do I have to do in the interrupt routine to allow for proper FreeRTOS compatibility. Would fastinterrupt method even be supported to run FreeRTOS? The reason I am asking, is I can see in portasm.S the function "interrupthandler" is doing special saving and loading of stack, etc. Would I need to do this to support fast_interrupts? Thanks in advance for all the help! FreeRTOS on Microblaze - fast_interrupt vs interrupt_handlerPosted by rtel on January 4, 2017 I have never done this so I'm not really sure, but I suspect if your fast interrupt is not using the FreeRTOS API, or at least not attempting to perform a context switch, then you probably don't have to do anything (other than ensure whatever resources are needed by the fast interrupt are provided).
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
|
|||||||||||||||
NXP tweet showing LPC5500 (ARMv8-M Cortex-M33) running FreeRTOS.
Meet Richard Barry and learn about running FreeRTOS on RISC-V at FOSDEM 2019
Version 10.1.1 of the FreeRTOS kernel is available for immediate download. MIT licensed.
View a recording of the "OTA Update Security and Reliability" webinar, presented by TI and AWS.
FreeRTOS and other embedded software careers at AWS.
